I almost did not come to post this one. It’s a bit raw, a bit saw and quite frankly – rather aggravating.
But I am a passionate advocate of positive change, and well – with multiple channels of social media being infiltrated with the means of raising awareness – I couldn’t not.
I have spent the best part of the past twelve months succumbing to three emotions due to my disordered eating: embarrassment, shame and guilt. And that’s on top of these emotions as they rear their ugly head as a part of the eating disorder: the panic-stricken calories counts after a meal out; the self-ridicule at not being ill enough; the crushing guilt following the consumption of a bed-time snack after a day of restriction.
No, I am talking about these emotions as they arise because of the disordered eating.
I am embarrassed daily when friends, family and work colleagues witness me managing to munch on my ‘safe’ foods. Shouldn’t I be embarrassed about supposedly having an eating disorder, when I am clearly able to eat? What’s the fuss all about – am I just kidding myself that I face a problem which I claim to be compromising my daily existence? I am embarrassed to sit in the GP as a last resort for seeking professional support after various attempts have failed because I didn’t meet the district health service’s criteria (which, ironically, requires me to lose more weight and precious bodily functions to be considered ‘ill enough’ to be entitled to outpatient support). Will my Doctor look me up and down, laugh in my face and tell me to have a good meal and get a good night’s sleep?
I am ashamed daily that I struggle with restrictive eating, because I too am a compassionate person. In my last job, I worked for a charity which raises money to fight holiday hunger for school children; add that to being in the privileged position of offering to buy a coffee or a sandwich for someone homeless in my local town, and its a toxic mixture which leaves me feeling utterly ridiculous for struggling with anorexia. I am ashamed because of the (false, in my opinion, I might add) association of eating disorders with a superficial narcissism that constitutes an ugly reflection of the self-absorbed, when the reality is that I am much more interested in my loved ones than I am in myself.
I feel guilty all the time, because my issues are felt by my loved ones. I sense their worry and concern in the face of destructive behavioural patterns; I feel guilt about burdening them when I need to offload my anguish and suffering in the face of no health care professional to share it with. I feel guilty whenever my coping mechanisms require that I am not easily pleased when it comes to receiving hospitality from friends and family in the face of food related anxieties.
In spite of all these negativities, though, I am unable to just switch off my disordered eating behaviours. In fact, when left unaddressed, the resulting self-loathing that follows leaves me in a place of despair and desperation, with the only seeming solution being to ‘live up to my fate’ and allow these irrational thought patterns to become absorbed entirely by my brain.
I am sharing this trail of thought which many facing eating disorders face because they are not permissible. It is already difficult enough for someone with a mental health condition to acknowledge their difficulty and seek help, given the stigma attached to illnesses which, on a physiological level, are deemed invisible by those who do not understand them. Current policy requires that these individuals must meet the specified criteria before they can access immediate help – which means that they must make an active effort to get sicker. Would we expect someone with a broken leg to have developed septicaemia before operating on the wound? I am sure you would agree that this seems perverse. So why is the standard so different in the case of eating disorders – the most life-threatening mental illnesses on record?
We must encourage a deeper understanding throughout our communities of the danger of eating disorders so that we can stand in unified defiance against current policy for the treatment of them. So that we can present alternative policies and agendas for changing the criteria for treatment to involve early intervention in them, so to protect and enable as many of those affected by these illnesses, as possible.
Safety in numbers, folks.
Love, Jasmine x

I am having to try extremely hard to embrace this particular truth on a dreary Sunday afternoon, when the reality of my recent decision to leave my job and life in Leeds is lurking in my mind.
